Re: changed files?

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Godmar Back (gback@cs.utah.edu)
Date: Sat Jan 09 1999 - 16:35:48 EST


 oops. I was so upset I didn't even finish reading your email.

I don't care whether we check the automake stuff in CVS or not.

I am convinced that AM_MAINTAINER_MODE (at the very least) is the way to go
until automake becomes as established and stable as configure.
I'd prefer having to say "please rebuild the Makefile.in's"
Maybe print a warning or some such: "your makefile.in may be out of date"
or some such.

>
> > Please convince me that automake is good thing.
>
> I think only time will do that. I know how it feels, when you start
> to get used to something that's different from what you're used to,
> and you don't really understand what are the benefits of it; I've
> lived that myself.
>
> However, as soon as I learned what to expect from automake, I started
> to appreciate it very much, and to miss it in packages that haven't
> adopted it.
>

Hey, the only thing I dislike about automake right now is that it
flat out broke my ability to build a working kaffe. Is this an irrational
fear of new things? I dont' think so. Is this an unwillingness to learn?
I really don't believe so. I'll even ask our admins to update to automake
1.3.45.beta3-f if that's what it takes. I really just want things to work.

Like an OS that's at its best if it does not get in the way, a build
environment is best if it "just works".

         - Godmar


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:33 EDT