Re: [xml] Extending XPath?

From: Bjorn Reese (breese@mail1.stofanet.dk)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 13:23:08 EDT

• Next message: Wayne Davison: "[xml] More win32 changes"
• Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Memory lacks using XMLLIB under MPE OS"
• In reply to: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Extending XPath?"
• Next in thread: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Extending XPath?"

Daniel Veillard wrote:

> Humm, you should also look at XML query.
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Query
>
> They will be using XPath extensively

Oh, I wasn't aware that there were two different initiatives.
What is the difference?

> Push and Pop are already exported in pre2.2.5. I just added
> registering and lookup of new functions and variables but it's
> untested for now.

Excellent.

May I suggest that the valuePush/Pop functions use prefixed
names to avoid potential naming conflicts?

I just implemented a version of the function registering based
on hash tables, which passes the XPath regression tests. Let me
know if you want a patch.

----
Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@rpmfind.net

• Next message: Wayne Davison: "[xml] More win32 changes"
• Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Memory lacks using XMLLIB under MPE OS"
• In reply to: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Extending XPath?"
• Next in thread: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Extending XPath?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 12 2000 - 13:45:26 EDT