From: Marc Sanfacon (sanm@copernic.com)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2000 - 14:55:39 EDT
Excellent, thank you. I applied your path to my code and it seems to work
well. I shall do more tests, though.
Marc.
-----Original Message-----
From: xml-request@rufus.w3.org [mailto:xml-request@rufus.w3.org]On
Behalf Of Wayne Davison
Sent: September 20, 2000 14:24
To: 'xml@rpmfind.net'
Subject: RE: [xml] uri.c bug in libxml2-2.2.3
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Marc Sanfacon wrote:
> But am I right when saying that 'ref' could be an absolute path ?
No, that is handled back in step 5. By the time we get to step 6, we know
that we're combining a relative path with the base path.
In fact, I don't even think that the res->patch[out - 1] != '/' check is
needed, since the only path that we could have copied over from "bas" (in
step 6a) ends in a slash. Thus, the test in my patch could be simplified
to just this:
if (out == 0)
res->path[out++] = '/';
..wayne..
---- Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rpmfind.net ---- Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rpmfind.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:43:13 EDT