From: Peter Jacobi (pj@walter-graphtek.com)
Date: Mon Jul 17 2000 - 08:27:05 EDT
Hi Daniel,
> But I agree with you
> there might be place where the lookup is just bogus.
> If you can send me (directly) the lines where this happen that
> would reduce the work needed for chasing them (and the the time
> needed to get this fixed :-)
There are fewer lines (compared to my initial impression) affected. So I
can attach the list below. I get about 10000 warnings for these 60 lines,
as each single comparison which will always yield the same result earns
a compiler warning. This can be seen as hint, how much comparisons
are done by the UNICODE classifying macros. Perhaps a table lookup
for the BMP would make sense.
Regards,
Peter
The list of lines:
parser.c(3436)
parser.c(3439)
parser.c(3440)
parser.c(3446)
parser.c(3449)
parser.c(3450)
valid.c(2419)
valid.c(2424)
valid.c(2427)
valid.c(2428)
valid.c(2452)
valid.c(2457)
valid.c(2460)
valid.c(2461)
valid.c(2467)
valid.c(2472)
valid.c(2475)
valid.c(2476)
valid.c(2503)
valid.c(2506)
valid.c(2507)
valid.c(2510)
valid.c(2513)
valid.c(2514)
valid.c(2541)
valid.c(2544)
valid.c(2545)
valid.c(2548)
valid.c(2551)
valid.c(2552)
valid.c(2559)
valid.c(2562)
valid.c(2563)
valid.c(2566)
valid.c(2569)
valid.c(2570)
xpath.c(2291)
xpath.c(2294)
xpath.c(2295)
xpath.c(3079)
xpath.c(3082)
xpath.c(3085)
xpath.c(3086)
xpath.c(3233)
xpath.c(3235)
xpath.c(3244)
xpath.c(3246)
xpath.c(3549)
xpath.c(3619)
xpath.c(3624)
xpath.c(3627)
xpath.c(3628)
xpath.c(3634)
xpath.c(3637)
xpath.c(3638)
xpath.c(3669)
htmlparser.c(2190)
htmlparser.c(2207)
end of list
---- Message from the list xml@xmlsoft.org Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@xmlsoft.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:30:23 EDT