Re: [xml] libxml directions?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Doolin (doolin@cs.utk.edu)
Date: Fri Feb 25 2000 - 10:49:59 EST

Next message: Justin Patterson: "[xml] Problem with XPath expression"
Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] libxml directions?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jacobi: "[xml] libxml directions?"

In message <20000225103231.A3827@w3.org>, Daniel Veillard writes:
>
>On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 10:16:19AM +0100, Peter Jacobi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I noticed huge activity on the W3C CVS and silence on tarballs.
>>
>> Can you please clarify the intended direction for libxml? Will there
>> be an
>> - 1.8.7
>> - 2.0.0 (possibly some incompitablities)
>> - 1.8.7 and 2.0.0
>
> 2.0.0, definitely ! I'm working on it
> 1.8.7, maybe if for example we need an old (binary compatible) lib
> with the now famous snprintf patch ...

Some indication of how this will break win32 build would be nice.
This info would come from a win32 contributer following CVS
(I am following my dissertation at the moment...).

I remain committed to maintaining a win32 buildable source, and
win32 static libs, even at the cost of reduced functionality.

Thanks,

Dave D

----
Message from the list xml@xmlsoft.org
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@xmlsoft.org

Next message: Justin Patterson: "[xml] Problem with XPath expression"
Previous message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] libxml directions?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Jacobi: "[xml] libxml directions?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:30:05 EDT