From: Alexandre Oliva (oliva@dcc.unicamp.br)
Date: Tue Feb 16 1999 - 21:34:56 EST
On Feb 16, 1999, Tim Wilkinson <tim@transvirtual.com> wrote:
> Okay so here's my proposal. It's *much* easlier to modify EGCS to
> support Kaffe than the other way round so why don't I make a version of
> What do you think?
Sounds reasonable, at least as a short-term solution. I believe that,
as soon as the gcj runtime is released and some version of egcs is
released with gcj support, its ABI will freeze, and, no longer having
to aim at a moving target, we'll have the choice of modifying to Kaffe
to support it, if we don't manage to get the patches included in the
official distribution. Meanwhile, requiring a patch for gcj is fine.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva aoliva@{acm.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:58:09 EDT