Re: ltdl.c

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Godmar Back (gback@cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 04 1999 - 11:33:13 EST


>
> Thanks for all your suggested fixes. I'll install them in the libtool
> and Kaffe CVS trees.
>
> BTW, what would you think of libltdl allowing clients to specify
> alternate implementations of malloc/free? Say,
> lt_use_malloc_free(malloc,free) ?
>

I think that's a good idea from which libltdl would benefit in many
other circumstances cause it makes it more embeddable.

Note, though, that it may not fix the underlying problem that we
can't afford *any* library to call *any* functions that's not
async-signal-safe.

        - Godmar


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:57 EDT