From: Alexandre Oliva (oliva@dcc.unicamp.br)
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 02:29:41 EST
On Feb 2, 1999, Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> more of Pat's fixes related to JTHREAD_SETJMP
> This should have been it; but I don't really have a Solaris machine
> fast enough to test this in a reasonable amount of time.
ExecTest and ProcessTest enter an endless loop, apparently because
they never get to process SIGCHLD. But I won't have time to look into
this this week :-(
> Also, I finally managed to negotiate a configure version with Alan
> that accommodates BeOS (which typedefs uint8 in its system files).
> Let me know if you don't like it.
The tests for those types seem to be missing, and so configure fails
to complete:
if test $foo = yes
would abort on Solaris if foo is not set. I'm installing a patch that
properly quotes the variables, but I didn't create the tests.
-- Alexandre Oliva http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva aoliva@{acm.org} oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org} Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil Received: (from majordom@localhost) by rpmfind.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA07481 for kaffe-core-list; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:55:21 -0500 Resent-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:55:21 -0500 Resent-Message-Id: <199902031655.LAA07481@rpmfind.net> X-Authentication-Warning: rpmfind.net: majordom set sender to owner-kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org using -f Received: from wrath.cs.utah.edu (wrath.cs.utah.edu [155.99.198.100]) by rpmfind.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA07477 for <kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:55:15 -0500 Received: from sal.cs.utah.edu (sal.cs.utah.edu [155.99.195.64]) by wrath.cs.utah.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26864 for <kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:55:15 -0700 (MST) From: Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> Received: (from gback@localhost) by sal.cs.utah.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA11214 for kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:56:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902031656.JAA11214@sal.cs.utah.edu> Subject: tests To: kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org (Kaffe Core Team) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 09:56:31 -0700 (MST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org Errors-To: kaffe-core-error@rufus.w3.org X-loop: kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org X-mailing-list: kaffe-core@rufus.w3.org Resent-from: kaffe-core@rufus.w3.orgThe test he supplied did this:
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for uint32], ac_cv_typedef_uint32, [AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include <kernel/OS.h>], [uint32 dummy_ui32;], ac_cv_typedef_uint32=yes, ac_cv_typedef_uint32=no)]) if test $ac_cv_typedef_uint32 = yes; then AC_DEFINE(HAVE_UINT32, 1, [Do we have uint32]) fi
And it did that for every single type (total of 8) --- this seemed to like it's unnecessarily clobbering configure.in with something really beos specific (or is there other systems that define "kernel/OS.h"?) And why should configure.in conclude that being able to include "kernel/OS.h" implies that we have uint32?
I really don't want to hardcode such stuff in configure.in, given that it's already 781 lines.
Or what do you have in mind?
- Godmar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:55 EDT