Re: more ltdl stuff and more

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Alexandre Oliva (oliva@dcc.unicamp.br)
Date: Mon Jan 18 1999 - 04:23:41 EST


On Jan 17, 1999, Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> wrote:

> Could we add a FAQ that briefly describes how your install tree should
> look after you type gmake install. This way, people can compare file
> by file whether they have old libraries in their install tree.

This is hardly doable. Library extensions vary widely from platform
to platform, as does the number of links per library.

Probably the best thing to do is to suggest people to run
`find $prefix -mtime +1' after `make install', to make sure no old
files remained.

> Actually, a FAQ.LD_LIBRARY_PATH would be nice to have too.

Do you mean KAFFELIBRARYPATH? LD_LIBRARY_PATH is unportable; several
platforms have chosen different names for this variable.

BTW, the current `kaffe' script does not take this into account but,
with libtool, we can find out the platform-dependent library path
environment variable and use it. Should I do it?

> Did the latest set of changes reintroduce the ability to load .so files yet?

Yep, it's been functional for a while.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:44 EDT