Re: make check

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Alexandre Oliva (oliva@dcc.unicamp.br)
Date: Thu Jan 14 1999 - 12:51:23 EST


On Jan 14, 1999, Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> wrote:

> Okay --- have you tried it?

Yes, at least before I created the BUILD_ENVIRONMENT script.

> My problem seems to be that $(top_builddir)/kaffe/kaffe/Kaffe$(EXEEXT does
> not have the +x bit set.

Huh? How come, doesn't the C compiler create programs with the
executable bit set?

Ah, now I see, that's a libtool-produced script that sets up
LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or equivalent). But it should definitely be
executable, since libtool `chmod +x's it.

> Also, note that ProcessTest still requires "Kaffe" in your path.

Do you mean it starts another instance of Kaffe? Then, we should
probably add a functional equivalent of `dirname $JAVA` to the PATH.

> However, we could actually pass that as argv[] if the TestScript allows
> that now.

That would be better.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:41 EDT