From: Archie Cobbs (archie@whistle.com)
Date: Thu Dec 03 1998 - 17:39:52 EST
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> > Alexandre Oliva writes:
> >> BTW, block.old and block.new were very poor name choices. For one,
> >> CVS will ignore the directory block.old in a CVS import :-(
>
> > That's pretty stupid of CVS IMHO. Anyway, you can override this
> > with "cvs import -I !"
>
> Yep, but I'll certainly forget to do that at some point. And I'm
> probably not the only one who maintains local trees of Kaffe... Why
> should we make people's lives harder?
>
> Can't we just junk the old scheme and adopt the new one? Is it likely
> to break anything?
Yeah, we should fix it. When is "block.old" going to go away and
"block.new" replace it? If that's going to be soon, then it would
make sense to just put the new stuff in "block" and get rid of
"block.old" and "block.new".
-Archie
___________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:05 EDT