Re: GC algorithms

From: Alexandre Oliva (oliva@dcc.unicamp.br)
Date: Thu Dec 03 1998 - 02:10:23 EST

• Next message: Godmar Back: "Ah! still deadlock"
• Previous message: Alexandre Oliva: "[CVS] commit"
• Next in thread: Tim Wilkinson: "Re: GC algorithms"
• Reply: Tim Wilkinson: "Re: GC algorithms"

On Dec 3, 1998, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> wrote:

> They do present performance figures, but I haven't gotten that far yet :-)
> The claim is that performance is no worse than normal "stop-the-world"
> GC..

Well, if they only mark as read-only pages that they have already
scanned in a certain pass, I can kind of believe it. But I wonder if
we could implement such a mechanism portably...

-- 
Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil

• Next message: Godmar Back: "Ah! still deadlock"
• Previous message: Alexandre Oliva: "[CVS] commit"
• Next in thread: Tim Wilkinson: "Re: GC algorithms"
• Reply: Tim Wilkinson: "Re: GC algorithms"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:05 EDT