From: Archie Cobbs (archie@whistle.com)
Date: Sun Oct 18 1998 - 18:40:24 EDT
Godmar Back writes:
> I was wondering if others have also problems accessing cvs.transvirtual.com.
> This is the situation for me since Friday:
I'm having the same problem.. getting stuck at this router:
> 13 surf-T1-gw.san-francisco.best.net (140.174.75.2) 50.109 ms 47.878 ms 47.419 ms
> 14 * * *
> 15 * * *
> Archie, could you please make the output of ThreadLocalTest deterministic?
Done, and waiting to check in... sorry about that problem.
> On a more positive note: I followed Tim's suggestion and implemented
> precise heap collection for ordinary objects. It is at a point where it
Cool..
> If a bit is set, I can omit making sure that I'm holding a pointer to an
> object, i.e., the lookup in the hashtable is no longer necessary. Instead,
> I mark the object directly. This leads to the problem of storing non-objects
> in objects. Here is my suggestion: let's store all non-objects as references
> to kaffe.util.Ptr. This is already the case in the thread libraries as well
> as in the awt (correct, Peter?); I changed java.lang.Throwable to put its
> backtrace in a kaffe.util.Ptr as well (instead of a java.lang.Object, as it
> was before --- btw, this needs to be declared transient.)
Are you talking about the problem of objects that contain pointers
to non-object blocks of memory (such objects are necessarily used
by native code)?
If so, why not just create a byte[] array to hold the native-private data?
I'm not sure I know what I'm asking about however..
-Archie
___________________________________________________________________________
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:57:00 EDT