From: Godmar Back (gback@cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 10 1998 - 12:47:06 EDT
Here's some feedback on the new hashtable implementation.
I've asked him to supply a test case.
Edouard is usually right in his remarks.
- Godmar
Forwarded message:
> From EP510777@exchange.FRANCE.NCR.com Thu Sep 10 06:38:55 1998
> Message-ID: <DD0C02B2EEEED111AADC0000C0DD44005537EC@sfrmas87.France.NCR.COM>
> From: "Parmelan, Edouard" <EP510777@exchange.FRANCE.NCR.com>
> To: "'Godmar Back'" <gback@cs.utah.edu>
> Subject: java.util.Hashtable BROKEN
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:38:15 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8)
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi Godmar,
>
> The new java.util.Hashtable class is borken:
> . remove() break the collision chain
> . should throws InvalidArgument
> . It is not optimized
>
> Please, temporaly disable the previous version.
>
> I have write a C++ Hashtable class with an interface
> very closed to the Java one's.
> It is also table driven, no tree for collision.
>
> I don't have any time now, but I can translate it in
> java in few days.
>
> Edouard.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 23 2000 - 19:56:56 EDT