From: TOM (ptittom@free.fr)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 20:29:30 EDT
On 27/10/2000 10:19:49 Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 01:42:35AM +0200, TOM wrote:
> > On 26/10/2000 14:57:06 Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > > - doesn't seem there is a namespace support for functions
> > > > (last() is equivalent to foo:last() and bar:last()), it'll
> > > > be necessary for proprietary XPath extension functions.
> > It's only for XSLT, not more generaly XPath.
> [...]
> Sounds simple: move the function registration to pair tuples
> (name, namespace_uri) in the hash table, with the second field as
> NULL for existing functions, and add an interface for qualifed
> function name registration.
Ok, I'll do that (asap but I've so many things to do...)
> Hum, this affects variables too (sounds logical but ...) ?
Yes since VariableReferences also are QNames:
[36] VariableReference ::= '$' QName
It's not explicitly expressed though.
---- Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rpmfind.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 27 2000 - 20:43:34 EDT