From: Daniel Veillard (Daniel.Veillard@w3.org)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 04:31:59 EDT
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:29:25PM +0200, TOM wrote:
> No, since <option> isn't an empty element but an element whose closing
> tag is ignorable.
> Doing this (considere <option> an empty element) you break up parsing
> when you have the closing tag : <option>My option</option>
Hum, I disagree, take the example of p
it's in the same class and the way it's fixed is the same:
add p in the list of the tags autoclosing itself
"p", "p", "head", "h1", "h2", "h3", "h4", "h5", "h6", NULL,
and same is applied to option
"option", "option", NULL,
Marc suggestion seems the adequate way to handle this. There may be
more element which can close option, in that case they should be added.
Daniel
-- Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | libxml Gnome XML toolkit Tel : +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/ Fax : +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org | http://rpmfind.net/ ---- Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rpmfind.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 24 2000 - 04:44:51 EDT