Re: [xml] Tree in libxml vs. gdome

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Daniel Veillard (Daniel.Veillard@w3.org)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 06:20:46 EDT

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:17:10AM +0530, Saravanan Ramaswamy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this question seems to be a dumb one.
>
> If I want to use the combination of libxml + gdome (because gdome offers
> a 'more' standardized DOM interface ??) is it possible to use only GDOME
> tree implementation ? In other words, can libxml directly populate GDOME
> tree (say by using a separate SAX handler) ? Will libxml work that way
> (without its own tree ...) ?

  Both gdome and the new gdome2 module are supposed to work directly on the
DOM tree built by libxml without special hacking needed. At least that's
my understanding !

Daniel 

-- 
Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | Today's Bookmarks :
Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux XML libxml WWW
Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Gnome rpm2html rpmfind
 http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | RPM badminton Kaffe
----
Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@rpmfind.net

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 16 2000 - 09:43:24 EDT