From: Bjorn Reese (breese@mail1.stofanet.dk)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 08:13:21 EDT
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> XPath spec don't define conformance level since this is intended for
> reuse by other specs but I really dislike the message
> "Oh we are only implementing 10% of the spec because that's what we need"
> Either you're spec compliant or not !
I fully agree. I did a bad job of explaining how I plan to approach
this.
My intension is not to build a SAX version of XPath per se. My
intension is to optimize the typical case on our documents, and
provide a fallback solution for the non-typical case.
I have not investigated this in any detail, but my current idea is
to take the set of XPath expressions and convert these into state
machines. When I discover that ancestry axes are used by any of the
expressions I will fall back to the DOM solution instead.
---- Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rpmfind.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 14 2000 - 09:43:39 EDT