Re: [xml] libxml for CE

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: FiSTY (fisty@fisty.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 09:20:39 EDT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Veillard" <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
To: <xml@rpmfind.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [xml] libxml for CE

> Not that i think that Windows code is what I would like to see on
> one of my embedded platform or appliances ;-), but yes patches are welcome
> (but please relative to a recent version, i.e. libxml1 patches won't help
> me much).
> I dislike compiler specific defines, but platform specific ones are okay
> (seems there is common agreement to say that CE is not the same platform
> as WIN32 :-). I also prefer changes encapsulated in header files like
> win32config.h than scattered around the code.

I ported 2.2.3 but I did have to litter #ifdef _WIN32_WCE all over the
place. It was very ugly. This is pretty well because open, close,
read/write, getenv, and errno are all over the place. I guess these could
be encapsulated someplace as xmlOpen, xmlClose, etc. then there'd be fewer
places to #ifdef.

...Matt 

----
Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@rpmfind.net

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 11 2000 - 09:43:42 EDT