Re: [xml] libxml -> .

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Doolin (doolin@cs.utk.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 09:18:52 EDT

Previous message: David Doolin: "Re: [xml] libxml -> ."
Maybe in reply to: Timothee Besset: "[xml] libxml -> ."

[]
>
> The right way will be to have an include/libxml tree in the libxml

Absolutely. I do this for the win32 port.

>sources . I would rather not have to change the structure of the
>CVS code base now, but I can probably manage to get the tarballs to follow

cvs can be picky about such things, but it is very doable.
It helps (alot) to understand how ./CVS/Entries works.

>this structure automatically. I don't think I will change the CVs structure
>(and hence my enviroment) soon, maybe when switching to libxml3 if it
>ever get released :-)
> I will play with the tarball generation,

I guess I am better with cvs than with tar, because I would find
much, much faster to reoroganize the repository than figure out
how to make tar so this!

----
Message from the list xml@rpmfind.net
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@rpmfind.net

Previous message: David Doolin: "Re: [xml] libxml -> ."
Maybe in reply to: Timothee Besset: "[xml] libxml -> ."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 09:43:51 EDT