From: David Doolin (doolin@cs.utk.edu)
Date: Sat May 27 2000 - 00:23:45 EDT
In message <200005261946.PAA13882@hydrogen>, mdf@angoss.com writes:
>
>> > 1) Is there a better way? [to generate XML documents than masses of
>> > fprintfs]
>
>Without some of the convenient syntax of C++ this will become really
>disgusting really fast, and prone to irritating bugs that are tedious
>to fix. But thats just my opinion; you might like wading through a
>sea of incomprehensible printfs, trying to make safe changes to the
>generator...
This can be handled very elegantly in pure c, using fprintf at the
lowest level. There is no need to create a sea of incomprehensible
printf's, and there is no reason that safe changes can't be easy
to add to the generator. The originator of the original message
is welcome to drop me an email (I already deleted the post), and
I will be glad to help out.
-dave d
doolin@ce.berkeley.edu
---- Message from the list xml@xmlsoft.org Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/ to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@xmlsoft.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:30:13 EDT