Re: [xml] Re: [gdome] gdome2

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Havoc Pennington (hp@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Mar 29 2000 - 20:10:34 EST


Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org> writes:
> Suppose that with gnome 2.0 all apps have to change
>
> #include <gnome/xxx.h>
> to
> #include <gnome2/xxx.h>
>
> then I'm pretty sure I would not be the only one to complain :-)
>

In gnome2 the headers will be in prefix/include/gnome2/libgnomeui/ and
prefix/include/gnome2/libgnome/, and gnome-config --cflags will output
-I prefix/include/gnome2, so apps don't have to change, then for
gnome3 the same things happens, etc., it is all
application-transparent just as for glibconfig.h and other headers we
have in weird places.

Also, the .so file itself is renamed, I think, but I'm not sure
exactly how that is set up. Elliot can give you more info.

Havoc

----
Message from the list xml@xmlsoft.org
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@xmlsoft.org


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:30:09 EDT