Re: [xml] Processing Instructions

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Daniel Veillard (Daniel.Veillard@w3.org)
Date: Wed Dec 29 1999 - 20:02:35 EST

Next message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Bug-Report: xmlNewNode"
Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "Re: [xml] win32"
In reply to: Mathias Hasselmann: "Re: [xml] Processing Instructions"

> [22] prolog ::= XMLDecl? Misc* (doctypedecl Misc*)?
> [23] XMLDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?>
>
> ...
>
> ««« cut «««
>
> You see this 'ugly' question mark behind »XMLDecl«?

Ah, yes the XMLDecl/PI indetermination problem !
I was initially thinking taht whoever whould do that (an <?xmlxxx
PI without the XML declaration) should be punished, but if James
Clark starts using it in W3C recommendations I should relax my
point :-)

Ok, fixed, thanks !

Daniel

-- 
	    [Yes, I have moved back to France !]
Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | Today's Bookmarks :
Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux, WWW, rpmfind,
Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | rpm2html, XML,
http://www.w3.org/People/W3Cpeople.html#Veillard | badminton, and Kaffe.
----
Message from the list xml@xmlsoft.org
Archived at : http://xmlsoft.org/messages/
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@xmlsoft.org

Next message: Daniel Veillard: "Re: [xml] Bug-Report: xmlNewNode"
Previous message: Peter Jacobi: "Re: [xml] win32"
In reply to: Mathias Hasselmann: "Re: [xml] Processing Instructions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:29:56 EDT