From: Joerg Wittenberger (Joerg.Wittenberger@pobox.com)
Date: Thu Nov 25 1999 - 04:38:05 EST
Daniel wrote:
> It seems I will have to go through a lenghty justification for
> having malloc'ed 240 bytes :-(, oh well here it is:
Hey Daniel! Don't cheat to us, in the other message you wrote:
> This sums up as 241 bytes, so I negelected it for the moment,
Don't mouse our bytes!
> Could you please indicate the operating system you're using which
> doesn't deallocate the malloc'ed memory when the program exits. Except
> a very few (and crude) OSes for embedded systems, all OSes I know do.
Some day it might be used to make up the elapsed time display on my
toaster! If it suddenly stops working because of lost bytes and burns
my breakfast I'm going to hunt and slap you!
Sorry, couldn't resist. ;-)
/Jerry
--
You can have it done fast,
you can have it done cheap,
and you can have it done well.
--- But you can only have two of those at once.
----
Message from the list xml@rufus.w3.org
Archived at : http://rufus.w3.org/veillard/XML/messages
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rufus.w3.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:29:52 EDT