From: James LewisMoss (dres@ioa.com)
Date: Tue Aug 10 1999 - 21:26:32 EDT
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 15:10:57 -0400, Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org> said:
I'm working on a debian packages to test with, and had a question.
Daniel> I'm about to release a version 1.5.0, with the following
Daniel> added:
Daniel> - added most of the XML validation, it's in an usable state,
Daniel> though some parts like ID checks are missing.
Daniel> - improved the xpath implementation, still no attributes/ID
Daniel> or comparisons but path queries should work
Daniel> - added quite a few tests
Daniel> - lots of bugfixes
Daniel> - this should fix the isinf and isnan not existing on Solaris
Daniel> and AIX platforms
Daniel> - For RPM users, the 1.5.0 RPM exports both libxml.so.0 and
Daniel> libxml.so.1 I did some compatibility tests with existing
Daniel> RPMs of gnumeric and gnorpm. It should be possible to
Daniel> update RedHat-6.0 setup with those RPMs.
Does this mean that the library is backwards compatible and it'd be
safe to install it as libxml.so.0 as well as libxml.so.1?
Just checking.
Thanks
Dres
Daniel> some early feedback om the developers already using libxml
Daniel> is extemely
Daniel> welcome before the big push,
gnotes is using libxml (so I figured I'd test :).
-- @James LewisMoss <dres@ioa.com> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.ioa.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach ---- Message from the list xml@rufus.w3.org Archived at : http://rufus.w3.org/veillard/XML/messages to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail majordomo@rufus.w3.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:29:41 EDT