[xml] Future directions for libxml

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Daniel Veillard (Daniel.Veillard@w3.org)
Date: Mon Feb 01 1999 - 10:01:53 EST


 Hi all,

here is a list of possible developments for/around libxml. I'm wondering
what people think as the most urgent (Ok, everything is urgent :-) :

  1/ Better conformance support (the parser fails some of the conformance
     tests from J.Clark).
  2/ DOM support i.e. complete and test gnome-dom
  3/ SAX API
  4/ internationalisation support: currently only ASCII/Iso-Latin-1 is
     handled properly, goal is to use UTF8 internally and allow
     input and output filters to Iso/UTF16/...
  5/ evolution toward validation (i.e. conformance to the DTD checks)

 I tend to proceed toward 1/ and 5/ currently but if people express
other priorities, I will try to follow their guidelines.
 Hence suggestions welcome,

Daniel

P.S. I'm still fighting to get the documentation embedded in the RPMs.

-- 
	    [Yes, I have moved back to France !]
Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C  INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | Today's Bookmarks :
Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux, WWW, rpmfind,
Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | rpm2html, Kaffe,
http://www.w3.org/People/W3Cpeople.html#Veillard | badminton, and Amaya.
----
Message from the list xml@rufus.w3.org
Archived at : http://rufus.w3.org/veillard/XML/messages
to unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe xml" | mail  majordomo@rufus.w3.org


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 02 2000 - 12:29:24 EDT